🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are more and more enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a recent research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently helped far-right groups by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national publications.

Berlin-based scholars noted that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core subjects like assimilation and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adapted their communication in response.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these ideas and signaled to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Implications for Democracy

"Public communication by established parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when mainstream groups were criticising the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the study was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another researcher. "The far right says something and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the radical right.

In a recent discussion, a then national leader advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found across Europe, as elected officials from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to France adopt the language of the radical right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that would have been inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," explained a study author.

Some parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the far right, despite research suggests that this approach drives voters to vote for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Voter Awareness

The extent of information gathered revealed that the influence of radical parties had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," commented a co-author. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the necessity for mainstream parties to carve out their own discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."