🔗 Share this article

During economic booms, there come moments where financial analysts question if exuberance has grown unreasonable.

Latest multibillion-dollar agreements between OpenAI and semiconductor manufacturers Nvidia and AMD have sparked questions regarding the viability of massive investments toward artificial intelligence systems.

What Makes these NVIDIA & AMD Agreements Concerning for Financial Watchers?

Several commentators express concern regarding the reciprocal nature in such arrangements. Under the conditions for NVIDIA's agreement, OpenAI agrees to pay the chipmaker with cash for processors, while the company commits to invest in OpenAI in exchange for non-controlling stakes.

Prominent UK technology backer James Anderson stated concern regarding similarities with vendor financing, where a business provides monetary assistance to clients buying its products – a precarious scenario if these buyers maintain overly optimistic revenue forecasts.

Vendor financing proved to be among the characteristics during that turn-of-the-millennium dotcom bubble.

"It's not quite like the practices numerous telecom providers engaged in during 1999-2000, but there are some similarities to it. I don't think it makes me feel completely at ease from that perspective of view," commented Anderson.

The Advanced Micro Devices deal also enmeshes OpenAI with another chip maker alongside NVIDIA. Under the agreement, OpenAI plans to utilize hundreds of thousands of AMD processors within its data centers – the central nervous systems of artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT – and gaining the option to buy 10% of AMD.

All of this is being driven through the insatiable demand of OpenAI and competitors for the maximum computing power available to push AI systems to increasingly significant performance advancements – as well as to satisfy expanding user demand.

Neil Wilson, British investor strategist at financial firm Saxo, remarked that deals like those between Nvidia and OpenAI collectively pointed to circumstances which "looks, smells and sounds like an economic bubble."

Which Represent the Other Indicators of Market Exuberance?

Anderson highlighted skyrocketing market values at prominent AI companies as another source for worry. OpenAI is now worth $500 billion (£372bn), versus $157 billion last October, whereas Anthropic almost trebled its valuation recently, rising from $60 billion this past March up to $170bn last month.

Anderson stated that the scale behind these valuation surges "concerned me." According to accounts, OpenAI reportedly posted revenue amounting to $4.3 billion in the initial six months of the current year, alongside an operating loss of $7.8 billion, as reported by technology publication The Information.

Recent stock value swings additionally alarmed experienced financial observers. For instance, AMD temporarily gained $80 billion to its market cap during equity trading this past Monday after OpenAI's announcement, while Oracle – one profiting from demand for AI support systems such as data centers – gained about $250 billion in one day in September after announcing better than expected earnings.

There is also an enormous investment spending boom, meaning expenditure for non-staff expenses such as buildings as well as hardware. The major quartet artificial intelligence "large-scale operators" – Facebook parent Meta, Google parent Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon – are expected to invest $325 billion in capital expenditures this year, roughly the economic output belonging to Portugal.

Is AI Adoption Warranting Investor Excitement?

Faith in artificial intelligence boom suffered a setback in August when the Massachusetts Institute of Technology released research indicating how 95% of companies are getting zero return on their investments in generative AI. Their report stated the problem lay not in the capabilities of AI systems but the manner in they were used.

The report indicated this represented an obvious manifestation of the "genAI divide", with startups led by young entrepreneurs noting a jump in income from deploying AI technologies.

These findings coincided with a substantial decline among AI support stocks including Nvidia as well as Oracle. It came 60 days following McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, reported that four out of five businesses report using genAI, but an identical proportion indicate no significant impact on their profitability.

McKinsey explained this occurs because AI systems are utilized toward broad applications like creating conference summaries and not targeted uses including highlighting risky suppliers and generating concepts.

Everything of this worries backers because an important commitment by AI companies like Alphabet, OpenAI and Microsoft is that when you buy their products, they will enhance efficiency – a measure for economic efficiency – by helping a single worker accomplish much more profitable work in a typical business day.

Nevertheless, there are additional clear indications pointing to broad embrace of AI. This week, OpenAI announced that ChatGPT is now accessed by 800 million people a week, up from the number at 500 million cited by OpenAI in March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, firmly maintains how interest for paid-for access for AI will continue to "sharply increase."

What the Bigger Picture Show?

Adrian Cox, an investment strategist with the Deutsche Bank Research Institute, says present circumstances feels like "we are at a crossroads when signals are flashing different colours."

Warning signs, he says, include enormous capital expenditure wherein "existing versions of chips might become outdated prior to spending pays off" together with the soaring market caps for privately-held firms such as OpenAI.

The amber signals involve over double in share prices of the "magnificent seven" US technology stocks. This is balanced by their price to earnings ratios – a measure determining if an investment stands fairly priced or not – that remain below past averages